Gang Crime Requires That Both Perpetrators a Belong To Same Gang

There are many criminal cases involving gangs in Long Beach Court.  In this case the appeals Court threw out the conviction of one gang member because the law did not support the jury’ decision.

Appellant (a “Puente 13” gang member) was convicted of robbery, participating in the felonious conduct of a criminal street gang, and other offenses, based on evidence he aided an 18th Street gang member, de la Paz, in obtaining money from Bransford. One issue on appeal was the sufficiency of the gang participation evidence.

On appeal the court threw out the case holding that Penal Code Section 186.22, subdivision (a) requires evidence that the defendant is an active gang participant who knows his gang engages in criminal conduct and who willfully promotes or assists “in any felonious criminal conduct by members of that gang.” The plain meaning of the statute reflects that the Legislature’s use of the word “that” preceding the singular “gang” refers to the same gang of which the defendant is an active participant. Appellant and de la Paz were members of different gangs and no evidence showed they were members of subsets of the same gang who typically work together. The evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction for gang participation.  (CCAP). This case was heard in a criminal Court near Long Beach, the law will apply to all cases throughout the state.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: